tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6233830264797174117.post8875273163569925261..comments2023-03-06T02:20:45.588-06:00Comments on Stuttered Submissions: Wow, nothing for months and now two things in one day.Matt Grossohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11806710554659602502noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6233830264797174117.post-79957026388589854912012-02-16T16:00:24.119-06:002012-02-16T16:00:24.119-06:00http://palabrasquevuelanteffy.blogspot.com/ me gus...http://palabrasquevuelanteffy.blogspot.com/ me gustas como escribis...voy a seguirte...entra a mi blog y fijate si te gusta lo que escriboHija del vientohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03579440506345266215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6233830264797174117.post-41126415145502952009-12-14T21:28:42.913-06:002009-12-14T21:28:42.913-06:00scratch that. looks meaningless in the cartesian ...scratch that. looks meaningless in the cartesian plane.<br /><br />i thought it might be a prime factorization thing, but that doesn't seem to be working out either.<br /><br />dagnabbit... still stumped for now.AdamBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14625655604759074752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6233830264797174117.post-85842131240874567712009-10-27T19:49:06.523-05:002009-10-27T19:49:06.523-05:00ah damn seth beat me to it. but i got it instantl...ah damn seth beat me to it. but i got it instantly.<br /><br />i don't know what the 2nd sequence is, but my first guess is that it draws something in the Cartesian plane?AdamBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14625655604759074752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6233830264797174117.post-64783692570778150942009-09-21T17:53:33.834-05:002009-09-21T17:53:33.834-05:00Ok, smarty pants. Tell me what this one is:
15, 11...Ok, smarty pants. Tell me what this one is:<br />15, 11, 1, 25, 8, 5, 18, 5, 23, 5, 7, 15.<br />It's hard to tell from the writing here they may be grouped in twos like this:<br />(15, 11), (1, 25), (8, 5), (18, 5), (23, 5), (7, 15)Matt Grossohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11806710554659602502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6233830264797174117.post-49373382987938366612009-09-21T17:48:47.996-05:002009-09-21T17:48:47.996-05:00That's just counting in base 3 ... strange cho...That's just counting in base 3 ... strange choice, though. The natural assumption for him would be base 2. It would go along with the name of the book: Volume 0, as computer scientists love counting from 0, and using base 2.Sethhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07725125656518016715noreply@blogger.com